Samsung Moohan vs Apple Vision Pro: Exciting Tech Specs

The future of extended reality is a major concern for two of the largest tech companies at a time when virtual and augmented worlds are developing quickly. The cutting edge of XR technology is represented by Samsung’s unreleased Project Moohan, which is scheduled to make its public debut in 2025, Samsung Moohan vs Apple Vision Pro, which is currently available to consumers. Even though the hardware on both devices is impressive, the way they approach the AI layer may be the difference between them.

I was recently given the opportunity to visit the Google campus and see Samsung’s XR headset prototype. I went to the Apple Store with that experience in hand and scheduled a 30-minute Apple Vision Pro demo so I could compare the two headsets.

Build Quality

The Apple Vision Pro combines smooth metallic accents with plush cloth materials to create a Demosthenian piece of craftsmanship. One discriminatory feature that gives it a sebaceous, futuristic appearance is the rounded, curved front of the eyeglasses. The speakers, which were ingeniously integrated into the straps, produced appreciable sound quality even in the inharmonious Apple Store during the persevering holiday season.

Project Moohan from Samsung, on the other hand, adopts a somewhat different strategy. It has a similar metallic frame and a slightly curved front glass, but it has a large hood cover that effectively blocks top light. By doing this, the immersive experience is improved, and the optional lower hood makes it even more so. Both devices are powered by external battery packs that reach from the headset to your belt buckle or pocket.

The EyeSight display on the outside of the goggles, which displays a picture of the user’s eyes, is one of the Vision Pro’s distinctive features. This is a fascinating idea for sustaining a connection with people in the room, but I was unable to test it.

Comfort

The comfort of the Vision Pro was inconsistent after 30 minutes of use. At first, the soft velcro fasteners and extra top-down support of the head strap made it feel snug and comfortable. Nevertheless, the device’s weight became apparent very quickly, and by the end of the session, my face was definitely warmer.

A somewhat different experience was offered by Project Moohan. Despite being more rigid and less form-fitting, its head strap had a twisty knob for adjustment that was surprisingly comfortable and form-fitting. It’s interesting to note that the top strap, which I encountered on the Vision Pro, was absent. In terms of weight distribution and heat management, the differences were most noticeable. After half an hour, I didn’t feel any “hot face,” and the device’s weight didn’t seem particularly noticeable either.

Control Methods

Similar hand control gestures are available on both devices, such as pinch, pinch-swipe, and two-hand pinch for object resizing. Eye tracking, which most users seemed to have intended as the control mechanism, is a major component of the Vision Pro. Despite being significantly longer than Moohan’s, the eye-tracking setup procedure was equally accurate. Some of Apple’s controls feature a distinctive physical crown that is reminiscent of the Apple Watch.

Moohan approaches input in a way that is more multimodal. Ray pointing is a built-in hand control feature, similar to what the Vision Pro provides for users who are willing to explore the accessibility settings. Additionally, the device has a trackpad surface on the side, and Moohan prioritizes voice control. Although eye tracking is used, it seems more like one of many options than the main technique. It is unclear whether external controllers will be included with the Moohan when it goes on sale next year, but Samsung has confirmed that the device will support them.

Voice control is where the biggest difference can be found. Moohan incorporates Google’s Gemini AI as a fundamental part of the Vision Pro’s experience, while the latter uses Siri for text input, basic commands, and most recently, ChatGPT queries. Gemini offers conversational context throughout the entire XR experience in addition to multimodal comprehension of the environment outside the headset, so it’s not just about giving commands.

Visual Experience

I was impressed by both devices’ crisp, high-resolution screens in terms of visual quality. When projected into the real world, movies, videos, and virtual objects looked vibrant and clear. In my opinion, there was almost no difference in the resolution between the two. Occasionally, the Vision Pro would flicker and have lower frame rates when in passthrough mode.

Nonetheless, it provided some distinctive visual elements, like the ability to use the crown to seamlessly switch between settings and a pleasing fade effect when someone enters my immediate space. Although Moohan’s field of view appeared to be smaller, it nevertheless made for some intriguing depth interactions. Although they didn’t stay in that position when I released them, I was able to push virtual windows behind actual objects. Although Moohan’s display’s precise specs are still unknown, I would be very interested in finding out more when they are made public later this year.

Ecosystem Integration

Apple’s ecosystem is reliably coordinated, which is one of its substantiality. AirPlay, iCloud, and a comprehensive collection of productivity apps like Pages and Keynote are just a few of the Apple services and devices with which the Vision Pro readily connects. Because visionOS, the operating system it runs on, supports the majority of iPadOS and iOS frameworks, developers can adapt existing apps with relative ease. The focus of Project Moohan is on the Google ecosystem, as I showcased Google Chrome, Google Photos, YouTube, and Google Maps in my demonstration.

The majority of Android apps should work with Android XR, according to developer documentation, though specifics are still being finalized. This could provide Moohan with a strong software library at launch. Regarding the extensive collection of games for the rival Meta Quest, Unity support ought to offer a smooth transition path for a reasonably easy port to Android XR.

Availability and Pricing

The Apple Vision Pro is now receivable, carrying a premium price of $3,499. By focusing on professionals and previous adopters, it inaugurates a strong position in the expensive market. There is still more mystery surrounding Samsung’s Project Moohan.

While some details are anticipated to be revealed at Samsung’s unannounced Unpacked event early in the year, it has been reported to launch sometime in 2025. I believe that the Moohan will be significantly less expensive than the Vision Pro, even though the official price has not yet been disclosed.

One More Thing: The AI Advantage

Project Moohan is unique because it places a strong focus on integrating AI. Not merely a feature, the Gemini-powered voice assistant is an essential component of your interactions with the gadget and your online environment. It’s possible that this conversational AI will make using XR feels less like navigating a complicated computer interface and more natural. Furthermore, Moohan’s comprehension of the real world is enhanced by Gemini’s multimodal on-device capabilities, which will add to the immersive experience of XR.

Even though Apple’s Vision Pro is an unquestionably amazing piece of hardware, Samsung’s strategy with Moohan seems like it might have more long-term implications. Samsung may be developing an XR platform that is more accessible and flexible by giving AI and multiple input methods priority.

XR’s greatest challenge, in my opinion, is to make the selected platform seem like an essential and natural part of our digital lives. Samsung offers us a glimpse of how these virtual spaces can be turned into an intelligent utility rather than just a distinctive and pricey curiosity, despite Apple’s first-mover advantage and distinctive premium appeal.

Conclusion

Both Apple’s Vision Pro and Samsung’s Project Moohan showcase efficacious XR advancements, but their approaches fluctuate considerably. While Apple focuses on premium design and a decisively coordinated ecosystem, Samsung emphasizes AI-driven interactions and multimodal controls. Moohan’s unfathomable integration with Google’s Gemini AI could reevaluate how users interrelate with XR, making it feel more intuitive and accessible.

Neeraj Gupta

Neeraj is a Content Strategist at The Next Tech. He writes to help social professionals learn and be aware of the latest in the social sphere. He received a Bachelor’s Degree in Technology and is currently helping his brother in the family business. When he is not working, he’s travelling and exploring new cult.

Follow us :