Biomedical Legislation: In What Cases Doctors Can Make Euthanasia

Biomedical Legislation: In What Cases Doctors Can Make Euthanasia

by Micah James — 2 years ago in Health 4 min. read

If a patient and family members express a desire for euthanasia, a doctor may terminate the patient’s life using painless ways.

When euthanasia is performed with the patient’s knowledge and agreement, we say that it was performed voluntarily. Australia, The Netherlands, Belgium, Canada, Colombia, Spain, Luxembourg, Switzerland, and New Zealand all permit euthanasia on request. It is also legal in the District of Columbia and the states of Oregon, Hawaii, Colorado, New Jersey, Washington, Maine, California, and Vermont.

When euthanasia occurs with someone who cannot give informed permission owing to their present medical state, they call it non-voluntary euthanasia. In this scenario, the choice regarding the individual’s future is taken by another person on their behalf, with consideration given to the person’s overall well-being.

When euthanasia takes place with a person who can give informed permission but does not, it is involuntary euthanasia. As it usually occurs against the victim’s will, this is classified as murder.

When Doctors can Make Euthanasia

The only way to legally get euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide in a given jurisdiction is to have been given a terminal prognosis. When doctors use the term “terminal,” it indicates they have given up hope of recovery, and they anticipate the patient to die soon.

You may need to demonstrate that you are in intolerable agony if you want to terminate your life lawfully. If this is the case, you may be able to determine when and how you wish to die legally.

There has been a growing movement in various parts of the world for the legalization of euthanasia. Another name for this practice is “dying with dignity.” You can read more about it in essays about euthanasia and academic paper samples created by professional writers and top-rated students. There are increasing numbers of people who believe assisted suicide and euthanasia should be legalized, but there are also those who do not. Many people think it’s wrong for doctors to aid in a patient’s death.

According to the American Medical Association (AMA), doctors’ primary responsibility is to ease the suffering of their terminally ill patients, not hasten their deaths. The American Medical Association (AMA) has said, “Physician-assisted suicide is completely incompatible with the doctor’s duty as a healer.”

Also read: What Is Blooket? How To Sign Up, Create Question Set, Join Blooket, & More + FAQs (Part I)

Pros and Cons of Euthanasia

Here are some of the most common arguments made in favor of and against the right to die.

Pros of Euthanasia

  1. The right to select one’s own fate, whether it be life or death, is a basic aspect of personal freedom. Hence, we should protect it. Self-determination should include the freedom to make medical decisions about one’s own body.
  2. By providing relief from excruciating agony, euthanasia has the potential to minimize or eliminate human suffering significantly. It’s immoral to subject individuals to pain against their choice.
  3. When someone’s quality of life has dropped, it can help alleviate their pain.
  4. It can make room for the treatment of another really ill person.
  5. It is crucial to establish guidelines for when it is appropriate to end life rather than just prohibiting it. The reason is that modern medicine can frequently keep individuals alive forever, even if they are not conscious.
  6. By choosing euthanasia, you are not showing a lack of compassion. Rather, you are prioritizing the needs of the patient.
  7. By allowing living wills, patients with terminal conditions can make their own decisions on artificial life support.

Negative Aspects of Euthanasia

  1. Euthanasia discredits the belief that every individual life is sacred and valuable.
  2. The vast majority of doctors and nurses would rather not participate in murdering patients because they perceive this as a counter to their primary mission of helping sick people get better.
  3. Concerns have been raised that euthanasia may be exploited as a means of reducing the expense of medical care, putting the wants and preferences of the patient in the background.
  4. Conflicts over mercy murders are challenging in practice, regardless of the ideology behind them. It is not always apparent what the patient needs or what is in their best interests. More calls for euthanasia would almost certainly lead to more drawn-out court fights. Check the story of Terri Schiavo. She is a Florida lady who remained in a coma for several years. Her spouse insisted the hospital remove her feeding tube, but her parents went to court to prevent it.
  5. There is a risk that legalizing euthanasia for the terminally ill might lead to a dangerous path. Older individuals with terminal illnesses might be killed by their own family members. Why? Because they either don’t want to care for them or are motivated by greed for their inheritances.
  6. One of the worst examples of euthanasia’s murky past may be found in Nazi Germany. It was employed there to kill off children and people condemned to death. If it continues to be illegal, no government will ever be able to utilize it for political purposes.

In What Legal Cases can Doctors Make Euthanasia

Laws establish the following fundamental protections, in addition to stringent qualifying criteria:

  • If an adult patient with a terminal illness requests medical assistance in dying, the treating physician has to discuss all available choices with the patient.
  • The attending physician has to notify the terminally ill adult that they have the option to change their mind at any moment. They also can choose from a variety of other alternatives. They can be supportive care, hospice care, pain management, and palliative care.
  • After obtaining the drug, the patient has the right to reconsider their decision. They can choose not to self-administer it. The treating physician must also provide the patient the option to withdraw their request.

All clinical choices, including those involving the use of medical assistance in dying, must be made with these fundamental principles in mind to guarantee that each patient’s wishes, requirements, and beliefs are respected.

Micah James

Micah is SEO Manager of The Next Tech. When he is in office then love to his role and apart from this he loves to coffee when he gets free. He loves to play soccer and reading comics.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Copyright © 2018 – The Next Tech. All Rights Reserved.